This blog post is not to be confused with the article “Corona Conspiracies” which was published April 13th by the National Review. In it, author Andrew Stuttaford lists the various theories of the virus’s origin and also speaks to the absurdity of conspiracy theories in general.

Conspire: to agree together, especially secretly, to do something wrong, evil, or illegal.
Conspiracy: the act of conspiring, an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

All conspiracies are theories until there is evidence to prove them.

Here in this post you will find references to many different things but all driving you to one purpose- THINK FOR YOURSELF. All of this may mean nothing despite looking as though it does.

Let’s assume for the sake of logic and lack of any real connection (other than to Wuhan, China and being arrested during this pandemic) that Dr. Charles Lieber had nothing to do with COVID-19.

Conjecture and speculation abound surrounding what’s actually happening. Arguments over the correct course of action will never stop, they will simply shift verb tense as we pass from hypothetical/planning, to current, and finally- hopefully sooner rather than later, the past.

Currently Johns Hopkins is reporting (based on numbers released from the Chinese government) China has 83,355 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and only 3,346 deaths. For a country that seems to care little for its citizens, that number seems extremely low. Now, did the authoritarian rule allow them to lock things down and crush the spread of the virus in their own country? Many sources are questioning the honesty/validity of their reporting.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

It’s going to take some critical thinking, some deep digging, reliable sources, and a whole lot of glue to put this all together. There can be many explanations for why 21 million cell phone accounts close in three months, but no matter how you slice it- it seems like a lot. Without knowing the locations of the account holders, the data isn’t nearly as useful.

Wuhan is a sprawling city of 3,280 sq mi, comprised of 13 districts, it has a populace of 11-15 million people (depending on who’s reporting). NYC is 468 sq mi, has 8.5 million, with a density 27,751/sq mi. The population density of Wuhan ranges drastically from 20.4k/ sq mi to a mere 321 depending on the district.

Hubei province, of which Wuhan is the capital city, reports a mere 3,222 deaths. New York City currently reports 7,905 dead and sadly more expected to expire. This is an honest question from a skeptic- are we supposed to believe China’s numbers? READ THIS and see what makes a lot more sense… China doesn’t report even 5,000 dead but it’s much more likely that 50,000 perished.

In an article published in The Lancet, the doctors who treated the original 41 patients in Wuhan, identified/verified by laboratory tests as confirmed COVID-19 cases, stated, “As of Jan 22, 2020, 28 (68%) of 41 patients have been discharged and six (15%) patients have died.” They also showed that the first patient to be admitted to the hospital had NO contact with the wet market.

In a larger sampling of the 835 Chinese cases confirmed as of Jan 24 only 25 had expired for a dramatically lower 3% mortality rate. But how many people were being tested and how far along were they in the viral progression?

“What you can safely say […] is that if you divide the number of reported deaths by the number of reported cases [to get the case fatality ratio], you will almost certainly get the wrong answer.” – Prof. John Edmunds

Running the numbers as John Edmunds tells us NOT to, New York’s mortality is around 5.4%, New Jersey 4.1%, and Massachusetts 3.4%- these being the top three states reporting the most infections (202k, 68k, 28k respectively). Does this MEAN anything? I don’t think anyone will know until this is all over and data can be compiled, organized, and analysed.

There’s so much confusion over whose death is labeled COVID, whose condition was exacerbated by the virus and IF the death certificate should read COVID, and if hospitals are reporting accurately or not. If the numbers are accurate then the world wide strategies are off and this whole thing is even more sideways than some already believe it is.

China benefits nothing by telling the truth and more likely garners the ire of the world by doing so.

Initially there was a paper written by a Chinese doctor and a possible other author detailing where they believe the virus came from. I gotta say, it makes sense what they say… of the people interviewed about the market- they all said that no one was eating or selling bats. The bats lived hundreds of miles away in caves and wouldn’t come to a metropolitan area BUT the Wuhan Center for Disease Control & Prevention was less than 1,000 feet from the market and working with the bats.

Both the WHCDC and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (which was only 12 kilometers from the market) were studying the viruses. From what I’ve read (take it or leave it)- over the past decade China has doubled the number of viruses from 2 to 4,000 that they had collected and were actively capturing the bats to extract viruses like SARS.

18 Nov 2019, The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China indeed posted a job opening, “asking for scientists to come research the relationship between the coronavirus and bats.”

24 December 2019, WIoV released another job posting. Looking for, “long-term research on the pathogenic biology of bats carrying important viruses has confirmed the origin of bats of major new human and livestock infectious diseases such as SARS and SADS, and a large number of new bat and rodent new viruses have been discovered and identified.”

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/04/13/coronavirus-covid-19-china-research-restrictions-watson-intl-hnk-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/coronavirus-intl/

From the many articles I’ve ingested in the last few days, I find it likely that COVID-19 wasn’t meant to be a weapon (at least not yet) but it did originate from the labs and not the market.

It isn’t a crazy idea that China would use bio-terrorism on the United States. You can easily find “Unrestricted Warfare” on Amazon (ironically it’s unavailable in any format currently) which was written by two Colonels in the Peoples Liberation Army. In this book they describe unconventional warfare against America and ways to weaken the country including: terrorism, legal action, economic positioning.

China has threatened to withhold drug ingredients, so it could plunge the United States into “the mighty sea of coronavirus.” They position themselves to make our economy more dependent upon them in the future. I would hope that we could take this time to reinvent ourselves, our country, and our economy. THAT’S UP TO US, we the people.

This is the hardest thing that many Americans have had to endure in their lives. Many have lost jobs, lost their sense of security and routine, suffered huge losses in retirement accounts, or worst of all- lost loved ones. It would be tempting to take “help” from China to prop up our economy as we rebuild from this disaster (even if it’s a poisoned carrot), after all, we just want things to get back to “normal.”

But things aren’t just skewed globally between governments- it’s become far more of a local issue- social distancing… does the government make examples of the few to prevent society from breaking ranks and attempting to return to daily routine OR do they resist the urge for the power grab and allow people to voluntarily comply with what they know is best practices to KEEP PEOPLE ALIVE?

Are we capable of governing ourselves? Those in power don’t think so. The communist in China are looking for a way to control their people even more AND emerge from the crisis they created as the leader in the world economy.

Meanwhile our state and local governments are trying not to look bad- they need to keep things copacetic so that they can remain in power when this whole situation is finally over. Better to restrict people and “save lives”, right?

The federal government released guidelines but it is imperative to understand that it is the STATES that are imposing these intense restrictions- you’ve read the articles about people being arrested or not being allowed to buy certain things. There IS an agenda and those in power will seize the moment to work, behind the curtain, the magic they’ve been trying to perform for years but didn’t have the proper distraction to pull off.

Why are abortion clinics open for abortion and not being used for overflow medical patients? If we have a lack of facilities I suggest using those buildings to SAVE lives rather than take them. Why are liquor stores open and churches are being harassed for “drive-in” services where no one has actual contact?

Is the constitution simply a guideline we can hit “pause” on when a crisis occurs? How much are you willing to take before you say or do something?

There are too many facets to this issue to cram into one post. Don’t expect this to become a regular topic for MG but keep your eyes open. Be a skeptic and look things up, READ and then read an opposing article. There have been some common sense statements, some from China, that have been retracted (can you guess why?) or redacted.

Are you COVID Crazy yet?
Drew Out.